Premium
Development and Validation of the Spondyloarthritis Radiography Module for Calibration of Readers Using the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score
Author(s) -
Maksymowych Walter P.,
Learch Thomas,
Lambert Robert G.,
Ward Michael,
Haroon Nigil,
Inman Robert,
Salonen David,
Gensler Lianne S.,
Weisman Michael H.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
arthritis care and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.032
H-Index - 163
eISSN - 2151-4658
pISSN - 2151-464X
DOI - 10.1002/acr.22083
Subject(s) - medicine , radiography , intraclass correlation , ankylosing spondylitis , reliability (semiconductor) , physical therapy , nuclear medicine , orthodontics , radiology , medical physics , surgery , psychometrics , clinical psychology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
Objective To develop and validate a reference image module aimed at calibration of readers using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) to assess radiographic progression in spondyloarthritis. Methods Our working group comprised 6 rheumatologists and 3 musculoskeletal radiologists. The following developmental steps were conducted: 1) review of the literature to identify aspects of the mSASSS requiring methodologic clarity; 2) independent assessment of baseline and 2‐year radiographs from 25 patients using the mSASSS (pilot exercise); 3) development of a training module (the Spondyloarthritis Radiography [SPAR] module) that clarifies definitions, rules, and scoring methodology and a set of reference radiographic images; 4) scoring exercise 1 by 6 readers on 39 patients, where baseline and 2‐year radiographs were scored blinded to time point; and 5) revision of the SPAR module followed by scoring exercise 2 conducted by the same 6 readers on 35 patients. Reliability of status and 2‐year change scores was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. Results ICCs for change scores for the radiologist reader pair improved from 0.46 to 0.62 after minimal calibration with the SPAR module. Recalibration from exercise 1 to exercise 2 with the SPAR module led to substantial improvement in interreader reliability for change in mSASSS score from ICC 0.44 (range 0.31–0.62) to ICC 0.62 (range 0.34–0.84). Simultaneous assessment of anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs did not enhance reliability or detection of progression. Conclusion Calibration according to the SPAR module led to improved reliability in the scoring of the mSASSS, even for expert readers.