Premium
Individual differences in failing to save everyday computing work
Author(s) -
Jones Gregory V.,
Martin Maryanne
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
applied cognitive psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1099-0720
pISSN - 0888-4080
DOI - 10.1002/acp.935
Subject(s) - redress , psychology , neglect , variation (astronomy) , cognition , everyday life , work (physics) , cognitive psychology , social psychology , applied psychology , epistemology , engineering , mechanical engineering , art , philosophy , physics , literature , neuroscience , psychiatry , astrophysics
It has been argued that the study of human–computer interaction (HCI) tends to neglect the user without advanced skills, and the prediction (as opposed to classification) of human error. The present work aims to redress these balances by attempting to obtain a predictive understanding of variation in susceptibility to computing error in everyday life among non‐specialist users. On rare occasions, people lose the computing work they are carrying out because they forget to save it. Is this a matter only of unfortunate chance? The results of two studies indicated that this is not so. In both cases, levels of naturally occurring computing losses were found to be significantly related to individuals' general levels of susceptibility to cognitive failure, assessed by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), suggesting a possible explanation in terms of variation in attentional ability. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.