Premium
GTIDHNIHS: I knew‐it‐all‐along
Author(s) -
Hom Harry L.,
Ciaramitaro Maria
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
applied cognitive psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1099-0720
pISSN - 0888-4080
DOI - 10.1002/acp.716
Subject(s) - hindsight bias , anagram , psychology , anagrams , task (project management) , cognitive psychology , set (abstract data type) , perception , neuropsychology , social psychology , cognition , expectancy theory , developmental psychology , computer science , psychiatry , management , neuroscience , programming language , economics
Abstract Individuals who do insight problems are highly susceptible to hindsight bias. Two sets of studies assessed the impact of hindsight consequences on participants' judgements about anagram difficulty and specific factors for performance. In the first set, hindsight participants underestimated anagram difficulty relative to participants with task experience (worksight). Also, supportive evidence revealed that hindsight consequences were related to self‐perceptions of confidence, ability, performance satisfaction, and subsequent performance expectations. In the second, two different hindsight techniques differentially impacted the participant's assessment of anagram difficulty. When comparing hindsight participants with and without worksight experience, the latter judged the anagrams to be easier. It is appropriate to examine further the cognitive and motivational consequences of hindsight bias in achievement situations. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.