z-logo
Premium
Mock juror's perceptions of a child witness passing or failing a truth and lies discussion or promising to tell the truth
Author(s) -
O'Connell Felicity,
Cherryman Julie,
Warmelink Lara
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
applied cognitive psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1099-0720
pISSN - 0888-4080
DOI - 10.1002/acp.3612
Subject(s) - witness , vignette , credibility , psychology , perception , social psychology , affect (linguistics) , forensic psychology , developmental psychology , law , criminology , political science , communication , neuroscience
Summary This study examined the effect of a child passing or failing the UK truth and lies discussion (TLD) compared with the Canadian promise to tell the truth on mock jurors' decisions regarding witness credibility and truthfulness and defendant guilt. Ninety‐two participants read a vignette that described a child witnessing his father physically attacking his mother. The vignette was manipulated for witness age (age 4 years and age 8 years) and TLD performance/promise. Supporting the hypotheses, participants rated the witness's credibility and truthfulness significantly higher after a witness passed a TLD and after promising to tell the truth. The age of the child witness did not significantly affect jurors' decision making. The results are discussed in relation to arguments regarding the abolition of the UK's TLD in favour of introducing a promise to tell the truth.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here