Premium
Misrepresentations and Flawed Logic About the Prevalence of False Memories
Author(s) -
Nash Robert A.,
Wade Kimberley A.,
Garry Maryanne,
Loftus Elizabeth F.,
Ost James
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
applied cognitive psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1099-0720
pISSN - 0888-4080
DOI - 10.1002/acp.3265
Subject(s) - false memory , psychology , cognition , false accusation , false belief , eyewitness testimony , cognitive psychology , memory errors , social psychology , recall , psychiatry , theory of mind
Summary Brewin and Andrews (2016) propose that just 15% of people, or even fewer, are susceptible to false childhood memories. If this figure were true, then false memories would still be a serious problem. But the figure is higher than 15%. False memories occur even after a few short and low‐pressure interviews, and with each successive interview, they become richer, more compelling, and more likely to occur. It is therefore dangerously misleading to claim that the scientific data provide an “upper bound” on susceptibility to memory errors. We also raise concerns about the peer review process. © 2016 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.