Premium
Professional Experience and Referencing Context Explain Variance in Use of Spatial Frames of Reference
Author(s) -
Hüther Lisa,
Müller Tanja,
Spada Hans
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
applied cognitive psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1099-0720
pISSN - 0888-4080
DOI - 10.1002/acp.3231
Subject(s) - psychology , frame of reference , variance (accounting) , context (archaeology) , reference frame , cognitive psychology , social psychology , frame (networking) , computer science , paleontology , telecommunications , physics , accounting , quantum mechanics , business , biology
Summary The location of objects in relation to other objects can be perceived of and communicated in different ways. Assuming that variance in spatial Frame of Reference (FoR) use may be explained by practical professional requirements, we reasoned that medical professionals may increasingly use the intrinsic FoR which because of its observer‐independence is less prone to misunderstandings than relative FoRs. We compared FoR‐use of beginner and advanced medical students ( n = 142) to that of law students ( n = 191) using 40 ambiguous referencing tasks. We found that medical students applied the intrinsic FoR more frequently than law students in a medical yet not in a generic context. Beginners did not differ from advanced students. Within contexts, individuals were highly consistent in their FoR‐use. Investigation of latencies indicates that processing of the intrinsic FoR becomes easier with practice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.