
Impact of iron deposit on the accuracy of quantifying liver fat fraction using multi‐material decomposition algorithm in dual‐energy spectral computed tomography
Author(s) -
Du Dandan,
Wu Xingwang,
Wang Jinchuan,
Chen Hua,
Song Jian,
Liu Bin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.13368
Subject(s) - mathematics , nuclear medicine , dual energy , imaging phantom , computed tomography , tomography , linear regression , medicine , statistics , radiology , osteoporosis , bone mineral , endocrinology
Objectives To investigate the accuracy of using multi‐material decomposition (MMD) algorithm in dual‐energy spectral computed tomography (CT) for quantifying fat fraction (FF) in the presence of iron. Materials Nine tubes with various proportions of fat and iron were prepared. FF were divided into three levels (10%, 20%, and 30%), recorded as references (FF ref ). Iron concentrations (in mg/100 g) were divided into three ranges (25.25–25.97, 50.38–51.55 and 75.57–77.72). The nine‐tube phantom underwent dual‐energy CT and MR. CT attenuation was measured and FF were determined using MMD in CT (FF CT ) and Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation (IDEAL‐IQ) in MR (FF MR ) for each tube. Statistical analyses used were: Spearman rank correlation for correlations between FF ref and CT attenuation, FF CT , and FF MR ; one‐way ANOVA, and one‐sample t ‐test for the differences between FF CT and FF ref and between FF MR and FF ref . A multivariate linear regression model was established to analyze the differences between the corresponding values with different iron concentrations under the same FF ref . Results Fat fraction on CT (FFCT) and FF MR were positively correlated with FF ref (all p < 0.001), while the CT attenuation was negatively correlated with FF ref in the three iron concentration ranges. For a given FF ref , FF CT decreased and FF MR increased as the iron concentration increased. The mean difference between FF CT and FF ref over the nine tube measurements was 0.25 ± 2.45%, 5.7% lower the 5.98 ± 3.33% value between FF MR and FF ref ( F = 310.017, p < 0.01). Conclusion The phantom results indicate that MMD in dual‐energy CT can directly quantify volumetric FF and is less affected by iron concentration than MR IDEAL‐IQ method.