
Examination of the best head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose maintaining a safe level of lens dose in whole‐brain radiotherapy using the four‐field box technique
Author(s) -
Shimizu Hidetoshi,
Sasaki Koji,
Aoyama Takahiro,
Tachibana Hiroyuki,
Tanaka Hiroshi,
Koide Yutaro,
Iwata Tohru,
Kitagawa Tomoki,
Kodaira Takeshi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.13151
Subject(s) - parotid gland , nuclear medicine , tilt (camera) , medicine , lens (geology) , confidence interval , salivary gland , head and neck , anatomy , physics , optics , pathology , surgery , mathematics , geometry
The parotid gland is recognized as a major‐risk organ in whole‐brain irradiation; however, the beam delivery from the left and right sides cannot reduce the parotid gland dose. The four‐field box technique using a head‐tilting device has been reported to reduce the parotid gland dose by excluding it from the radiation field. This study aimed to determine the appropriate head tilt angle to reduce the parotid gland dose in the four‐field box technique. The bilateral, anterior, and posterior beams were set for each of ten patients. The orbitomeatal plane angle (OMPA) was introduced as an indicator that expresses the head tilt angle. Next, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to understand the interrelationship between variables (dosimetric parameters of the lens and parotid gland and OMPA). In PCA, the angle between the OMPA vector and maximum lens dose or mean parotid gland dose vector was approximately opposite or close, indicating a negative or positive correlation [r = −0.627 ( p < 0.05) or 0.475 ( p < 0.05), respectively]. The OMPA that reduced the maximum lens dose to <10 Gy with a 95% confidence interval was approximately 14°. If the lens dose was not considered, the parotid gland dose could be reduced by decreasing the OMPA.