z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of setup error in the single‐isocenter technique on stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases
Author(s) -
Nakano Hisashi,
Tanabe Satoshi,
Utsunomiya Satoru,
Yamada Takumi,
Sasamoto Ryuta,
Nakano Toshimichi,
Saito Hirotake,
Takizawa Takeshi,
Sakai Hironori,
Ohta Atsushi,
Abe Eisuke,
Kaidu Motoki,
Aoyama Hidefumi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.13081
Subject(s) - isocenter , radiosurgery , nuclear medicine , reduction (mathematics) , computer science , mathematics , biomedical engineering , radiation therapy , medicine , imaging phantom , radiology , geometry
In conventional stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), treatment of multiple brain metastases using multiple isocenters is time‐consuming resulting in long dose delivery times for patients. A single‐isocenter technique has been developed which enables the simultaneous irradiation of multiple targets at one isocenter. This technique requires accurate positioning of the patient to ensure optimal dose coverage. We evaluated the effect of six degrees of freedom (6DoF) setup errors in patient setups on SRS dose distributions for multiple brain metastases using a single‐isocenter technique. We used simulated spherical gross tumor volumes (GTVs) with diameters ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 cm. The distance from the isocenter to the target's center was varied from 0 to 15 cm. We created dose distributions so that each target was entirely covered by 100% of the prescribed dose. The target's position vectors were rotated from 0°–2.0° and translated from 0–1.0 mm with respect to the three axes in space. The reduction in dose coverage for the targets for each setup error was calculated and compared with zero setup error. The calculated margins for the GTV necessary to satisfy the tolerance values for loss of GTV coverage of 3% to 10% were defined as coverage‐based margins. In addition, the maximum isocenter to target distance for different 6DoF setup errors was calculated to satisfy the tolerance values. The dose coverage reduction and coverage‐based margins increased as the target diameter decreased, and the distance and 6DoF setup error increased. An increase in setup error when a single‐isocenter technique is used may increase the risk of missing the tumor; this risk increases with increasing distance from the isocenter and decreasing tumor size.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here