Open AccessTwo‐dimensional solid‐state array detectors: A technique for in vivo dose verification in a variable effective area
Author(s) -
Utitsarn Kananan,
Biasi Giordano,
Stansook Nauljun,
Alrowaili Ziyad A.,
Petasecca Marco,
Carolan Martin,
Perevertaylo Vladimir L.,
Tomé Wolfgang A.,
Kron Tomas,
Lerch Michael L. F.,
Rosenfeld Anatoly B.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12744
Subject(s) - detector , ionization chamber , optics , radiation , range (aeronautics) , physics , image resolution , diode , transmission (telecommunications) , photon , dose profile , resolution (logic) , materials science , nuclear medicine , ionization , computational physics , imaging phantom , optoelectronics , medicine , ion , quantum mechanics , computer science , composite material , electrical engineering , artificial intelligence , engineering
Purpose We introduce a technique that employs a 2D detector in transmission mode (TM) to verify dose maps at a depth of d max in Solid Water. TM measurements, when taken at a different surface‐to‐detector distance (SDD), allow for the area at d max (in which the dose map is calculated) to be adjusted. Methods We considered the detector prototype “MP512” (an array of 512 diode‐sensitive volumes, 2 mm spatial resolution). Measurements in transmission mode were taken at SDDs in the range from 0.3 to 24 cm. Dose mode (DM) measurements were made at d max in Solid Water. We considered radiation fields in the range from 2 × 2 cm 2 to 10 × 10 cm 2 , produced by 6 MV flattened photon beams; we derived a relationship between DM and TM measurements as a function of SDD and field size. The relationship was used to calculate, from TM measurements at 4 and 24 cm SDD, dose maps at d max in fields of 1 × 1 cm 2 and 4 × 4 cm 2 , and in IMRT fields. Calculations were cross‐checked (gamma analysis) with the treatment planning system and with measurements (MP512, films, ionization chamber). Results In the square fields, calculations agreed with measurements to within ±2.36%. In the IMRT fields, using acceptance criteria of 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm, calculations had respective gamma passing rates greater than 96.89%, 90.50%, 62.20% (for a 4 cm SSD); and greater than 97.22%, 93.80%, 59.00% (for a 24 cm SSD). Lower rates (1%/1 mm criterion) can be explained by submillimeter misalignments, dose averaging in calculations, noise artifacts in film dosimetry. Conclusions It is possible to perform TM measurements at the SSD which produces the best fit between the area at d max in which the dose map is calculated and the size of the monitored target.