
Impact of patient centering in CT on organ dose and the effect of using a positioning compensation system: Evidence from OSLD measurements in postmortem subjects
Author(s) -
Barreto Izabella,
Lamoureux Rebecca,
Olguin Catherine,
Quails Nathan,
Correa Nathalie,
Rill Lynn,
Arreola Manuel
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12594
Subject(s) - medicine , nuclear medicine , pelvis , dosimeter , abdomen , radiology , dosimetry
The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and impact of vertical mis‐centering on organ doses in computed tomography ( CT ) exams and evaluate the effect of a commercially available positioning compensation system ( PCS ). Mis‐centering frequency and magnitude was retrospectively measured in 300 patients examined with chest‐abdomen‐pelvis CT . Organ doses were measured in three postmortem subjects scanned on a CT scanner at nine different vertical table positions (maximum shift ± 4 cm). Organ doses were measured with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters inserted within organs. Regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between organ doses and mis‐centering. Methods were repeated using a PCS that automatically detects the table offset to adjust tube current output accordingly. Clinical mis‐centering was >1 cm in 53% and 21% of patients in the vertical and lateral directions, respectively. The 1‐cm table shifts resulted in organ dose differences up to 8%, while 4‐cm shifts resulted in organ dose differences up to 35%. Organ doses increased linearly with superior table shifts for the lung, colon, uterus, ovaries, and skin ( R 2 = 0.73–0.99, P < 0.005). When the PCS was utilized, organ doses decreased with superior table shifts and dose differences were lower (average 5%, maximum 18%) than scans performed without PCS (average 9%, maximum 35%) at all table shifts. Mis‐centering occurs frequently in the clinic and has a significant effect on patient dose. While accurate patient positioning remains important for maintaining optimal imaging conditions, a PCS has been shown to reduce the effects of patient mis‐centering.