Open AccessMaximizing rectal dose sparing with hydrogel: A retrospective planning study
Author(s) -
Paetkau Owen,
Gagne Isabelle M.,
Pai Howard H.,
Lam Jacqueline,
Goulart Jennifer,
Alexander Abraham
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12566
Subject(s) - rectum , medicine , prostate , nuclear medicine , radiation therapy , radiation treatment planning , prostate cancer , radiology , urinary bladder , urology , surgery , cancer
External beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer can result in urinary, sexual, and rectal side effects, often impairing quality of life. A polyethylene glycol‐based product, SpaceOAR© hydrogel ( SOH ), implanted into the connective tissue between the prostate gland and rectum can significantly reduce the dose received by the rectum and hence risk of rectal toxicity. The optimal way to manage the hydrogel and rectal structures for plan optimization is therefore of interest. In 13 patients, computerized tomography ( CT ) scans were taken pre‐ and post‐Space OAR © implant. A prescription of 60 Gy in 20 fractions was planned on both scans. Six treatment plans were produced per anonymized dataset using either a structure of rectum plus the hydrogel, termed composite rectum wall ( CRW ), or rectal wall ( RW ) as an inverse optimization structure and intensity modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT ) or volumetric modulated arc therapy ( VMAT ) as a treatment technique. Dose‐volume histogram metrics were compared between plans to determine which optimization structure and treatment technique offered the maximum rectal dose sparing. RW structures offered a statistically significant decrease in rectal dose over CRW structures, whereas the treatment technique ( IMRT vs VMAT ) did not significantly affect the rectal dose. There was improvement seen in bladder and penile bulb dose when VMAT was used as a treatment technique. Overall, treatment plans using the RW optimization structure offered the lowest rectal dose while VMAT treatment technique offered the lowest bladder and penile bulb dose.