z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ultra‐low dose CT colonography with automatic tube current modulation and sinogram‐affirmed iterative reconstruction: Effects on radiation exposure and image quality
Author(s) -
Cianci Roberta,
Delli Pizzi Andrea,
Esposito Gianluigi,
Timpani Mauro,
Tavoletta Alessandra,
Pulsone Pierluigi,
Basilico Raffaella,
Cotroneo Antonio Raffaele,
Filippone Antonella
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12510
Subject(s) - image quality , nuclear medicine , supine position , medicine , iterative reconstruction , radiation dose , image noise , effective dose (radiation) , radiology , computer science , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence
Objective To assess the radiation dose and image quality of ultra‐low dose ( ULD )‐C T colonography ( CTC ) obtained with the combined use of automatic tube current ( mA s) modulation with a quality reference mA s of 25 and sinogram‐affirmed iterative reconstruction ( SAFIRE ), compared to low‐dose ( LD ) C TC acquired with a quality reference mA s of 55 and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP). Methods Eighty‐two patients underwent ULD ‐ CTC acquisition in prone position and LD ‐ CTC acquisition in supine position. Both ULD ‐ CTC and LD ‐ CTC protocols were compared in terms of radiation dose [weighted volume computed tomography dose index ( CTDI vol ) and effective dose], image noise, image quality, and polyp detection. Results The mean effective dose of ULD ‐ CTC was significantly lower than that of LD ‐ CTC (0.98 and 2.69  mS v respectively, P  < 0.0001) with an overall dose reduction of 63.2%. Image noise was comparable between ULD ‐ CTC and LD ‐ CTC (28.6 and 29.8 respectively, P  = 0.09). There was no relevant difference when comparing image quality scores and polyp detection for both 2D and 3D images. Conclusion ULD ‐ CTC allows to significantly reduce the radiation dose without meaningful image quality degradation compared to LD ‐ CTC .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom