Open AccessQuality assurance of Cyberknife robotic stereotactic radiosurgery using an angularly independent silicon detector
Author(s) -
Alhujaili Sultan Fahad,
Biasi Giordano,
Alzorkany Faisal,
Grogan Garry,
Al Kafi Muhammed A.,
Lane Jonathan,
Hug Benjamin,
Aldosari Abdullah H.,
Alshaikh Sami,
Farzad Pejman Rowshan,
Ebert Martin A.,
Moftah Belal,
Rosenfeld Anatoly B.,
Petasecca Marco
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12496
Subject(s) - cyberknife , imaging phantom , diode , detector , quality assurance , radiosurgery , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , materials science , ionization chamber , physics , optics , optoelectronics , medicine , radiation therapy , radiology , ionization , ion , external quality assessment , pathology , quantum mechanics
Purpose The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of an angularly independent silicon detector (edgeless diodes) developed for dosimetry in megavoltage radiotherapy for Cyberknife in a phantom and for patient quality assurance ( QA ). Method The characterization of the edgeless diodes has been performed on Cyberknife with fixed and IRIS collimators. The edgeless diode probes were tested in terms of basic QA parameters such as measurements of tissue‐phantom ratio ( TPR ), output factor and off‐axis ratio. The measurements were performed in both water and water‐equivalent phantoms. In addition, three patient‐specific plans have been delivered to a lung phantom with and without motion and dose measurements have been performed to verify the ability of the diodes to work as patient‐specific QA devices. The data obtained by the edgeless diodes have been compared to PTW 60016, SN edge, PinPoint ionization chamber, Gafchromic EBT 3 film, and treatment planning system ( TPS ). Results The TPR measurement performed by the edgeless diodes show agreement within 2.2% with data obtained with PTW 60016 diode for all the field sizes. Output factor agrees within 2.6% with that measured by SN EDGE diodes corrected for their field size dependence. The beam profiles’ measurements of edgeless diodes match SN EDGE diodes with a measured full width half maximum ( FWHM ) within 2.3% and penumbra widths within 0.148 mm. Patient‐specific QA measurements demonstrate an agreement within 4.72% in comparison with TPS . Conclusion The edgeless diodes have been proved to be an excellent candidate for machine and patient QA for Cyberknife reproducing commercial dosimetry device measurements without need of angular dependence corrections. However, further investigation is required to evaluate the effect of their dose rate dependence on complex brain cancer dose verification.