z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Volumetric‐based image guidance is superior to marker‐based alignments for stereotactic body radiotherapy of prostate cancer
Author(s) -
Li Wen,
Lu Lan,
Stephans Kevin L,
Sharma Naveen,
Vassil Andrew,
Shen Zhilei Liu,
Stockham Abigail,
Djemil Toufik,
Tendulkar Rahul D,
Xia Ping
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12280
Subject(s) - medicine , prostate , prostate cancer , nuclear medicine , cone beam computed tomography , image guided radiation therapy , radiation therapy , radiology , cancer , computed tomography
Purposes The aim of this study was to evaluate a dual marker‐based and soft‐tissue based image guidance for inter‐fractional corrections in stereotactic body radiotherapy ( SBRT ) of prostate cancer. Methods/Materials We reviewed 18 patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer. An endorectal balloon was inserted at simulation and each treatment. Planning margins were 3 mm/0 mm posteriorly. Prior to each treatment, a dual image guidance protocol was applied to align three makers using stereoscopic x ray images and then to the soft tissue using kilo‐voltage cone beam CT ( kV ‐ CBCT ). After treatment, prostate ( CTV ), rectal wall, and bladder were delineated on each kV ‐ CBCT , and delivered dose was recalculated. Dosimetric endpoints were analyzed, including V 36.25 Gy for prostate, and D 0.03 cc for bladder and rectal wall. Results Following initial marker alignment, additional translational shifts were applied to 22 of 84 fractions after kV ‐ CBCT . Among the 22 fractions, ten fractions exceeded 3 mm shifts in any direction, including one in the left‐right direction, four in the superior‐inferior direction, and five in the anterior‐posterior direction. With and without the additional kV ‐ CBCT shifts, the average V 36.25 Gy of the prostate for the 22 fractions was 97.6 ± 2.6% with the kV x ray image alone, and was 98.1 ± 2.4% after applying the additional kV ‐ CBCT shifts. The improvement was borderline statistical significance using Wilcoxon signed‐rank test ( P = 0.007). D 0.03 cc was 45.8 ± 6.3 Gy vs. 45.1 ± 4.9 Gy for the rectal wall; and 49.5 ± 8.6 Gy vs. 49.3 ± 7.9 Gy for the bladder before and after applying kV ‐ CBCT shifts. Conclusions Marker‐based alignment alone is not sufficient. Additional adjustments are needed for some patients based kV ‐ CBCT .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom