z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sum signal dosimetry: A new approach for high dose quality assurance with Gafchromic EBT 3
Author(s) -
Cusumano Davide,
Fumagalli Maria Luisa,
Ghielmetti Francesco,
Rossi Linda,
Grossi Giuliano,
Lanzarotti Raffaella,
Fariselli Laura,
De Martin Elena
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1002/acm2.12045
Subject(s) - dosimetry , nuclear medicine , quality assurance , calibration , radiosurgery , materials science , medicine , radiation therapy , mathematics , statistics , radiology , pathology , external quality assessment
Abstract Gafchromic EBT 3 film dosimetry in radiosurgery ( RS ) and hypofractionated radiotherapy ( HRT ) is complicated by the limited film accuracy at high fractional doses. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate sum signal ( SS ) film dosimetry to increase dose resolution at high fractional doses, thus allowing for use of EBT 3 for dose distribution verification of RS / HRT treatments. To characterize EBT 3 dose–response, a calibration was performed in the dose range 0.44–26.43 Gy. Red ( RC ) and green ( GC ) channel net optical densities were linearly added to produce the SS . Dose resolution and overall accuracy of the dosimetric protocol were estimated and compared for SS , RC , and GC . A homemade Matlab software was developed to compare, in terms of gamma analysis, dose distributions delivered by a Cyberknife on EBT 3 films to dose distributions calculated by the treatment planning system. The new SS and conventional single channel ( SC ) methods were compared, using 3%/1 and 4%/1 mm acceptance criteria, for 20 patient plans. Our analysis shows that the SS dose–response curve is characterized by a steeper trend in comparison with SC , with SS providing a higher dose resolution in the whole dose range investigated. Gamma analysis confirms that the percentage of points satisfying the agreement criteria is significantly higher for SS compared to SC : 95.03% vs. 88.41% ( P = 0.014) for 3%/1 mm acceptance criteria and 97.24% vs. 93.58% ( P = 0.048) for 4%/1 mm acceptance criteria. This study demonstrates that the SS approach is a new and effective method to improve dosimetric accuracy in the framework of the RS ‐ HRT patient‐specific quality assurance protocol.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom