Premium
Behavioural assessment of bullying behaviour among personality disordered patients in a high secure hospital
Author(s) -
Ireland Jane L.,
Bescoby Nicola
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
aggressive behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.223
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1098-2337
pISSN - 0096-140X
DOI - 10.1002/ab.20073
Subject(s) - aggression , psychology , injury prevention , clinical psychology , poison control , suicide prevention , ethnic group , personality , occupational safety and health , human factors and ergonomics , psychiatry , medicine , medical emergency , social psychology , pathology , sociology , anthropology
The current study explored the nature and extent of direct, indirect, and coercive bullying behaviours among adult male forensic patients residing on a Personality‐Disorder Unit. There was a subsidiary aim of examining the prevalence and characteristics of four categories of patients, namely ‘pure bullies,’ ‘bully/victims,’ ‘pure victims,’ and those ‘not‐involved.’ It was predicted that patients would report more indirect than direct bullying behaviours and that bully/victims would represent the most prevalent category overall. It was also predicted that the four bully‐categories would be predicted by the behaviours that they demonstrated. The sample consisted of 53 adult male patients. Bullying behaviour was assessed using the Direct and Indirect Patient behaviour Checklist – Hospital version (DIPC‐H). Approximately half of all patients reported engaging in at least one interaction defined as ‘bullying others’ in the previous week. Estimates of behaviours indicative of ‘being bullied’ were markedly higher with over half reporting at least one interaction in the previous week. Indirect aggression was reported more frequently than direct aggression. Within direct aggression, verbal behaviours were reported most frequently. Bully/victims were found to represent the most prevalent category with just over one‐third of all patients classified as such followed by pure victims, pure bullies, and those not‐involved. The categories were not predicted by personal/descriptive characteristics such as age, ethnic origin; length of time spent in the hospital, on the ward, and in secure settings throughout their life. Bully/victims were predicted by increased negative behaviour, with no behavioural predictors found for the other categories. The implications of these findings for anti‐bullying strategies and future research are presented. Aggress. Behav. 31:1–17, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.