Premium
Retaliatory motivation enhances attributions of hostility when people process ambiguous social stimuli
Author(s) -
Topalli Volkan,
O'Neal Edgar C.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
aggressive behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.223
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1098-2337
pISSN - 0096-140X
DOI - 10.1002/ab.10068
Subject(s) - hostility , aggression , psychology , attribution , social psychology , interpersonal communication , perception , attribution bias , poison control , anger , human factors and ergonomics , relevance (law) , social perception , interpersonal relationship , injury prevention , suicide prevention , developmental psychology , medicine , environmental health , law , neuroscience , political science
We hypothesized that provocation and readiness to aggress (Retaliatory Motivation) would increase the tendency to construe the ambiguous actions of others as reflecting hostile intent. Male undergraduates were either verbally provoked or not provoked by a male experimenter and half were led to believe that they would be allowed to retaliate anonymously against the provoker in the form of a potentially damaging written evaluation. Participants then rated the hostility and aggressive intent of the characters in brief ambiguous scenarios of interpersonal conflict. According to prediction, men who were provoked and anticipated retaliation against their provoker rated the scenarios as containing hostility and aggression to a significantly greater extent than did non‐provoked or merely provoked participants. Results are discussed within a motivation‐based affective relevance model of perception. Aggr. Behav. 29:155–172, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.