Premium
Comparison of Sampling and Detection Methods for Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Naturally Infected with Myxobolus cerebralis
Author(s) -
Chiaramonte Luciano V.,
Burbank David,
Scott Roberta,
Trushenski Jesse T.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of aquatic animal health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.507
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1548-8667
pISSN - 0899-7659
DOI - 10.1002/aah.10008
Subject(s) - biology , hatchery , chinook wind , zoology , oncorhynchus , myxozoa , polymerase chain reaction , fish fin , parasite hosting , anatomy , fish <actinopterygii> , fishery , gene , genetics , world wide web , computer science
Myxobolus cerebralis ( Mc ) is a myxozoan parasite causing whirling disease in hatchery‐ and natural‐origin salmonids. To minimize spread of this parasite and the incidence of its associated disease, fish health professionals routinely screen fish for Mc before stocking or moving the fish to Mc ‐free waters. Sample collection for Mc traditionally entails lethal sampling of cranial tissue followed by pepsin–trypsin digest ( PTD ) and screening of the sample for mature myxobolid myxospores ( PTD method); however, nonlethal sampling methods would be advantageous in some circumstances, such as when dealing with rare or otherwise valuable fish. Accordingly, we compared Mc detections in cranial cartilage by using the PTD method with PCR assays of fin biopsies collected from juvenile Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and adult steelhead O. mykiss . Cranial samples were also analyzed using PCR methods for comparative purposes. Results indicated that Mc could be detected by PCR in fin clips, but the results generated by this approach differed significantly from those associated with PTD ‐ and/or PCR ‐based analysis of cranial cartilage samples. Polymerase chain reaction‐based analysis—of individual head samples and head digest pools in both species as well as fins in steelhead—yielded more positive detections than PTD analysis alone. The PCR ‐based analysis of head and fin tissues yielded different Mc detection rates in both species, but the nature of the detection disparity varied depending on the species and/or life stage of the fish. We conclude that for lethal cranial samples, neither PTD nor PCR should be used alone, but using these techniques in concert may provide the most complete and accurate estimation of Mc presence in a group of salmonids. If imperiled or highly valuable fish are in question, nonlethal fin samples may be used to generate some information regarding Mc status, with the understanding that parasite DNA detections do not necessarily signify mature infections or disease.