Premium
The Big Picture: Imaging of the Global Geospace Environment by the TWINS Mission
Author(s) -
Goldstein J.,
McComas D. J.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
reviews of geophysics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 8.087
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1944-9208
pISSN - 8755-1209
DOI - 10.1002/2017rg000583
Subject(s) - exosphere , solar wind , physics , energetic neutral atom , geomagnetic storm , environmental science , ion , atmospheric sciences , plasma , quantum mechanics
Encircling our planet at distances of 2.5 to 8 Earth radii is a dynamic plasma population known as the ring current (RC). During geomagnetic storms, the solar wind's interaction with Earth's magnetic field pumps petaJoules of energy into the RC, energizing and transporting particles. To measure the global geospace response, RC imaging is performed by capturing energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) created by charge exchange between geospace ions and the neutral exosphere. The H exosphere is itself imaged via its geocoronal Lyman‐ α glow. Two Wide‐angle Imaging Neutral‐atom Spectrometers (TWINS) is a stereoscopic ENA and Lyman‐ α imaging mission that has recorded the deep minimum of solar cycle (SC) 23 and the moderate maximum of SC 24, observing geospace conditions ranging from utterly quiet to major storms. This review covers TWINS studies of the geospace response published during 2013 to 2017. Stereo ENA imaging has revealed new dimensionality and structure of RC ions. Continuous coverage by two imagers has allowed monitoring storms from start to finish. Deconvolution of the low‐altitude signal has extended ENA analysis and revealed causal connections between the trapped and precipitating ion populations. ENA‐based temperature and composition analyses have been refined, validated, and applied to an unprecedented sequence of solar activity changes in SC 23 and SC 24. Geocoronal imaging has revealed a surprising amount of time variability and structure in the neutral H exosphere, driven by both Sun and solar wind. Global models have been measurably improved. Routine availability of simultaneous in situ measurements has fostered huge leaps forward in the areas of ENA validation and cross‐scale studies.