z-logo
Premium
Control of Delta Avulsion by Downstream Sediment Sinks
Author(s) -
Salter Gerard,
Paola Chris,
Voller Vaughan R.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: earth surface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9011
pISSN - 2169-9003
DOI - 10.1002/2017jf004350
Subject(s) - sink (geography) , bifurcation , geology , downstream (manufacturing) , delta , upstream (networking) , mechanics , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , physics , geotechnical engineering , engineering , geography , telecommunications , operations management , cartography , quantum mechanics , nonlinear system , astronomy
Understanding how fluxes are partitioned at delta bifurcations is critical for predicting patterns of land loss and gain in deltas worldwide. Although the dynamics of river deltas are influenced from both upstream and downstream, previous studies of bifurcations have focused on upstream controls. Using a quasi‐1‐D bifurcation model, we show that flow switching in bifurcations is strongly influenced by downstream sediment sinks. We find that coupling between upstream and downstream feedbacks can lead to oscillations in water and sediment flux partitioning. The frequency and initial rate of growth/decay of the oscillations depend on both upstream and downstream conditions, with dimensionless bifurcate length and bypass fraction emerging as key downstream parameters. With a strong offshore sink, causing bypass in the bifurcate branches, we find that bifurcation dynamics become “frozen”; that is, the bifurcation settles on a permanent discharge ratio. In contrast, under depositional conditions, we identify three dynamical regimes: symmetric; soft avulsion, where both branches remain open but the dominant branch switches; and full avulsion. Finally, we show that differential subsidence alters these regimes, with the difference in average sediment supply to each branch exactly compensating for the difference in accommodation generation. Additionally, the model predicts that bifurcations with shorter branches are less asymmetric than bifurcations with longer branches, all else equal, providing a possible explanation for the difference between backwater length distributaries, which tend to be avulsive, and relatively stable mouth‐bar‐scale networks. We conclude that bifurcations are sensitive both quantitatively and qualitatively to downstream sinks.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here