z-logo
Premium
Self‐organized kilometer‐scale shoreline sand wave generation: Sensitivity to model and physical parameters
Author(s) -
Idier Déborah,
Falqués Albert,
Rohmer Jérémy,
Arriaga Jaime
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: earth surface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9011
pISSN - 2169-9003
DOI - 10.1002/2017jf004197
Subject(s) - bathymetry , instability , perturbation (astronomy) , shore , geology , curvature , breaking wave , surf zone , submarine pipeline , mechanics , physics , geometry , geodesy , wave propagation , geotechnical engineering , oceanography , optics , mathematics , quantum mechanics
The instability mechanisms for self‐organized kilometer‐scale shoreline sand waves have been extensively explored by modeling. However, while the assumed bathymetric perturbation associated with the sand wave controls the feedback between morphology and waves, its effect on the instability onset has not been explored. In addition, no systematic investigation of the effect of the physical parameters has been done yet. Using a linear stability model, we investigate the effect of wave conditions, cross‐shore profile, closure depth, and two perturbation shapes (P1: cross‐shore bathymetric profile shift, and P2: bed level perturbation linearly decreasing offshore). For a P1 perturbation, no instability occurs below an absolute critical angle θ c 0 ≈ 40–50°. For a P2 perturbation, there is no absolute critical angle: sand waves can develop also for low‐angle waves. In fact, the bathymetric perturbation shape plays a key role in low‐angle wave instability: such instability only develops if the curvature of the depth contours offshore the breaking zone is larger than the shoreline one. This can occur for the P2 perturbation but not for P1. The analysis of bathymetric data suggests that both curvature configurations could exist in nature. For both perturbation types, large wave angle, small wave period, and large closure depth strongly favor instability. The cross‐shore profile has almost no effect with a P1 perturbation, whereas large surf zone slope and gently sloping shoreface strongly enhance instability under low‐angle waves for a P2 perturbation. Finally, predictive statistical models are set up to identify sites prone to exhibit either a critical angle close to θ c 0 or low‐angle wave instability.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here