z-logo
Premium
Multimodel Surface Temperature Responses to Removal of U.S. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
Author(s) -
Conley A. J.,
Westervelt D. M.,
Lamarque J.F.,
Fiore A. M.,
Shindell D.,
Correa G.,
Faluvegi G.,
Horowitz L. W.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2017jd027411
Subject(s) - radiative forcing , northern hemisphere , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , forcing (mathematics) , radiative transfer , climatology , aerosol , meteorology , geography , geology , physics , quantum mechanics
Three Earth System models are used to derive surface temperature responses to removal of U.S. anthropogenic SO 2 emissions. Using multicentury perturbation runs with and without U.S. anthropogenic SO 2 emissions, the local and remote surface temperature changes are estimated. In spite of a temperature drift in the control and large internal variability, 200 year simulations yield statistically significant regional surface temperature responses to the removal of U.S. SO 2 emissions. Both local and remote surface temperature changes occur in all models, and the patterns of changes are similar between models for northern hemisphere land regions. We find a global average temperature sensitivity to U.S. SO 2 emissions of 0.0055 K per Tg(SO 2 ) per year with a range of (0.0036, 0.0078). We examine global and regional responses in SO 4 burdens, aerosol optical depths (AODs), and effective radiative forcing (ERF). While changes in AOD and ERF are concentrated near the source region (United States), the temperature response is spread over the northern hemisphere with amplification of the temperature increase toward the Arctic. In all models, we find a significant response of dust concentrations, which affects the AOD but has no obvious effect on surface temperature. Temperature sensitivity to the ERF of U.S. SO 2 emissions is found to differ from the models' sensitivity to radiative forcing of doubled CO 2 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here