Premium
The OCO‐2 oxygen A‐band response to liquid marine cloud properties from CALIPSO and MODIS
Author(s) -
Richardson Mark,
McDuffie James,
Stephens Graeme L.,
Cronk Heather Q.,
Taylor Tommy E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2017jd026561
Subject(s) - lidar , radiance , moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer , standard deviation , remote sensing , cloud top , environmental science , sciamachy , cloud computing , liquid water path , satellite , aerosol , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , physics , geology , mathematics , astronomy , computer science , statistics , operating system
Spectra of reflected sunlight in the oxygen A‐band contain information about cloud properties such as cloud top pressure, optical depth, and pressure thickness. Here we show, for the first time, that high‐spectral‐resolution A‐band Orbiting Carbon Observatory‐2 (OCO‐2) spectra respond largely as simulated to the optical properties of water clouds over ocean during November 2015 ( N = 184,318) using input cloud properties from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on Aqua and the Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization on Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO). In A‐band continuum channels the standard deviation of simulated minus observed radiance is ±37%. Selecting horizontally homogeneous clouds to mitigate three‐dimensional cloud effects and collocation error with the other satellites, the standard deviation of the residuals is reduced to ±18%. Using a look‐up table developed from simulations, OCO‐2's estimated cloud top pressure for low clouds ( P top > 680 hPa) has a standard deviation of ±61 hPa relative to CALIPSO retrievals, and bias is dependent on assumed cloud pressure thickness, with our smallest value being −5 hPa. Versus MODIS optical depth, the standard deviation is ±9.0 and the bias is −2.0, although these shrink for clouds of τ < 30 . These values include collocation error between the different satellites, meaning that they place an upper bound on the OCO‐2 retrieval uncertainty. The theoretical precision limit from OCO‐2's instrumental uncertainty is shown to be ±2.4 hPa in above‐cloud path and ±0.2% in optical depth for a two‐channel retrieval. Options for retrieving cloud optical depth, cloud top pressure, and pressure thickness are discussed in the context of a formal OCO‐2 cloud property retrieval.