Premium
Warm layer and cool skin corrections for bulk water temperature measurements for air‐sea interaction studies
Author(s) -
Alappattu Denny P.,
Wang Qing,
Yamaguchi Ryan,
Lind Richard J.,
Reynolds Mike,
Christman Adam J.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9291
pISSN - 2169-9275
DOI - 10.1002/2017jc012688
Subject(s) - sea surface temperature , longwave , environmental science , wind speed , atmospheric sciences , mixed layer , radiometer , climatology , meteorology , radiation , remote sensing , geology , physics , optics
The sea surface temperature (SST) relevant to air‐sea interaction studies is the temperature immediately adjacent to the air, referred to as skin SST. Generally, SST measurements from ships and buoys are taken at depths varies from several centimeters to 5 m below the surface. These measurements, known as bulk SST, can differ from skin SST up to O (1°C). Shipboard bulk and skin SST measurements were made during the Coupled Air‐Sea Processes and Electromagnetic ducting Research east coast field campaign (CASPER‐East). An Infrared SST Autonomous Radiometer (ISAR) recorded skin SST, while R/V Sharp's Surface Mapping System (SMS) provided bulk SST from 1 m water depth. Since the ISAR is sensitive to sea spray and rain, missing skin SST data occurred in these conditions. However, SMS measurement is less affected by adverse weather and provided continuous bulk SST measurements. It is desirable to correct the bulk SST to obtain a good representation of the skin SST, which is the objective of this research. Bulk‐skin SST difference has been examined with respect to meteorological factors associated with cool skin and diurnal warm layers. Strong influences of wind speed, diurnal effects, and net longwave radiation flux on temperature difference are noticed. A three‐step scheme is established to correct for wind effect, diurnal variability, and then for dependency on net longwave radiation flux. Scheme is tested and compared to existing correction schemes. This method is able to effectively compensate for multiple factors acting to modify bulk SST measurements over the range of conditions experienced during CASPER‐East.