Premium
Sensitivity of Seismic Attenuation and Phase Velocity to Intrinsic Background Anisotropy in Fractured Porous Rocks: A Numerical Study
Author(s) -
Barbosa Nicolás D.,
Rubino J. Germán,
Caspari Eva,
Holliger Klaus
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1002/2017jb014558
Subject(s) - anisotropy , seismic anisotropy , poromechanics , isotropy , attenuation , geology , seismic wave , stiffness , porous medium , mechanics , geophysics , porosity , geotechnical engineering , materials science , physics , optics , composite material
Many researchers have analyzed seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion due to wave‐induced fluid flow (WIFF) related to the presence of fluid‐saturated fractures embedded in an isotropic porous background. Most fractured formations do, however, exhibit some degree of intrinsic elastic and hydraulic anisotropy of the background, and the impact of which on the effective seismic properties remains largely unexplored. In this work, we extend a numerical upscaling procedure to account for the potential intrinsic elastic and hydraulic anisotropy of the background. To do this, we represent the background of a representative sample of the fractured formation of interest with an anisotropic poroelastic medium and apply a set of relaxation experiments to compute the effective anisotropic seismic properties. A comprehensive numerical analysis allows us to observe that, for samples containing hydraulically connected fractures, the anisotropic behavior of both P and S waves differs significantly from that observed for an isotropic background. The anisotropy of the stiffness of the background plays a fundamental role for WIFF between the fractures and the background as well as for WIFF between connected fractures. Conversely, the anisotropy of the background permeability affects the characteristic frequency, the angle dependence, and the magnitude of the effects related to WIFF between fractures and background. In addition, different correlations between hydraulic and elastic background anisotropy lead to different degrees of effective seismic anisotropy. Our results therefore indicate that accounting for the effects of intrinsic background anisotropy on WIFF is crucial for a quantitative interpretation of seismic anisotropy measurements in fluid‐saturated fractured formations.