Premium
Mechanical behavior, failure mode, and transport properties in a porous carbonate
Author(s) -
Baud Patrick,
Exner Ulrike,
Lommatzsch Marco,
Reuschlé Thierry,
Wong Tengfong
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1002/2017jb014060
Subject(s) - cementation (geology) , cataclastic rock , porosity , compaction , materials science , permeability (electromagnetism) , brittleness , macropore , carbonate , deformation bands , grain size , geology , composite material , geotechnical engineering , metallurgy , microstructure , cement , seismology , membrane , mesoporous material , fault (geology) , biochemistry , chemistry , biology , genetics , catalysis
We performed a systematic investigation of mechanical compaction, strain localization, and permeability in Leitha limestone. This carbonate from the area of Vienna (Austria) occurs with a broad range of grain sizes and porosity, due to changes in depositional regime and degree of cementation. Our new mechanical data revealed a simple relation between porosity and mechanical strength in both the brittle and ductile regimes. Increasing cementation and decreasing porosity led to a significant increase of the rock strength in both regimes. Micromechanical modeling showed that the dominant micromechanisms of inelastic deformation in Leitha limestone are pore‐emanated microcracking in the brittle regime, and grain crushing and cataclastic pore collapse in the ductile regime. Microstructural analysis and X‐ray computed tomography revealed the development of compaction bands in some of the less cemented samples, while more cemented end‐members failed by cataclastic flow in the compactant regime. In contrast to mechanical strength, permeability of Leitha limestone was not significantly impacted by increasing cementation and decreasing porosity. Our microstructural and tomography data showed that this was essentially due to the existence of a backbone of connected large macropores in all our samples, which also explained the relatively high permeability (in the range of 2–5 darcies) of Leitha limestone in comparison to other carbonates with significant proportion of micropores.