Premium
First Study on the Occurrence Frequency of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles over West Africa Using an All‐Sky Airglow Imager and GNSS Receivers
Author(s) -
Okoh Daniel,
Rabiu Babatunde,
Shiokawa Kazuo,
Otsuka Yuichi,
Segun Bolaji,
Falayi Elijah,
Onwuneme Sylvester,
Kaka Rafiat
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2017ja024602
Subject(s) - airglow , solstice , sky , earth's magnetic field , atmospheric sciences , daytime , plasma , environmental science , ionosphere , local time , physics , geodesy , geography , meteorology , astronomy , latitude , magnetic field , statistics , mathematics , quantum mechanics
Abstract This is the first paper that reports the occurrence frequency of equatorial plasma bubbles and their dependences of local time, season, and geomagnetic activity based on airglow imaging observations at West Africa. The all‐sky imager, situated in Abuja (Geographic: 8.99°N, 7.38°E; Geomagnetic: 1.60°S), has a 180° fisheye view covering almost the entire airspace of Nigeria. Plasma bubbles are observed for 70 nights of the 147 clear‐sky nights from 9 June 2015 to 31 January 2017. Differences between nighttime and daytime ROTIs were also computed as a proxy of plasma bubbles using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers within the coverage of the all‐sky imager. Most plasma bubble occurrences are found during equinoxes and least occurrences during solstices. The occurrence rate of plasma bubbles was highest around local midnight and lower for hours farther away. Most of the postmidnight plasma bubbles were observed around the months of December to March, a period that coincides with the harmattan period in Nigeria. The on/off status of plasma bubble in airglow and GNSS observations were in agreement for 67.2% of the total 768 h, while we suggest several reasons responsible for the remaining 32.8% when the airglow and GNSS bubble status are inconsistent. A majority of the plasma bubbles were observed under relatively quiet geomagnetic conditions ( Dst ≥ −40 and Kp ≤ 3), but there was no significant pattern observed in the occurrence rate of plasma bubbles as a function of geomagnetic activity. We suggest that geomagnetic activities could have either suppressed or promoted the occurrence of plasma bubbles.