Premium
Impacts of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration patterns on downscaling soil moisture in regions with large topographic relief
Author(s) -
Cowley Garret S.,
Niemann Jeffrey D.,
Green Timothy R.,
Seyfried Mark S.,
Jones Andrew S.,
Grazaitis Peter J.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1002/2016wr019907
Subject(s) - downscaling , environmental science , precipitation , evapotranspiration , water content , vegetation (pathology) , moisture , soil water , hydrology (agriculture) , soil science , geology , meteorology , geography , geotechnical engineering , pathology , medicine , ecology , biology
Soil moisture can be estimated at coarse resolutions (>1 km) using satellite remote sensing, but that resolution is poorly suited for many applications. The Equilibrium Moisture from Topography, Vegetation, and Soil (EMT+VS) model downscales coarse‐resolution soil moisture using fine‐resolution topographic, vegetation, and soil data to produce fine‐resolution (10–30 m) estimates of soil moisture. The EMT+VS model performs well at catchments with low topographic relief (≤124 m), but it has not been applied to regions with larger ranges of elevation. Large relief can produce substantial variations in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET), which might affect the fine‐resolution patterns of soil moisture. In this research, simple methods to downscale temporal average precipitation and PET are developed and included in the EMT+VS model, and the effects of spatial variations in these variables on the surface soil moisture estimates are investigated. The methods are tested against ground truth data at the 239 km 2 Reynolds Creek watershed in southern Idaho, which has 1145 m of relief. The precipitation and PET downscaling methods are able to capture the main features in the spatial patterns of both variables. The space‐time Nash‐Sutcliffe coefficients of efficiency of the fine‐resolution soil moisture estimates improve from 0.33 to 0.36 and 0.41 when the precipitation and PET downscaling methods are included, respectively. PET downscaling provides a larger improvement in the soil moisture estimates than precipitation downscaling likely because the PET pattern is more persistent through time, and thus more predictable, than the precipitation pattern.