Premium
How does reach‐scale stream‐hyporheic transport vary with discharge? Insights from rSAS analysis of sequential tracer injections in a headwater mountain stream
Author(s) -
Harman C. J.,
Ward A. S.,
Ball A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1002/2016wr018832
Subject(s) - tracer , environmental science , hyporheic zone , hydrology (agriculture) , streams , flow (mathematics) , scale (ratio) , volumetric flow rate , breakthrough curve , discharge , soil science , mechanics , chemistry , geology , geography , physics , drainage basin , computer science , environmental engineering , geotechnical engineering , surface water , computer network , organic chemistry , adsorption , nuclear physics , cartography
The models of stream reach hyporheic exchange that are typically used to interpret tracer data assume steady‐flow conditions and impose further assumptions about transport processes on the interpretation of the data. Here we show how rank Storage Selection (rSAS) functions can be used to extract “process‐agnostic” information from tracer breakthrough curves about the time‐varying turnover of reach storage. A sequence of seven slug injections was introduced to a small stream at base flow over the course of a diel fluctuation in stream discharge, providing breakthrough curves at discharges ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 L/s. Shifted gamma distributions, each with three parameters varying stepwise in time, were used to model the rSAS function and calibrated to reproduce each breakthrough curve with Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiencies in excess of 0.99. Variations in the fitted parameters over time suggested that storage within the reach does not uniformly increase its turnover rate when discharge increases. Rather, changes in transit time are driven by both changes in the average rate of turnover (external variability) and changes in the relative rate that younger and older water contribute to discharge (internal variability). Specifically, at higher discharge, the turnover rate increased for the youngest part of the storage (corresponding to approximately 5 times the volume of the channel), while discharge from the older part of the storage remained steady, or declined slightly. The method is shown to be extensible as a new approach to modeling reach‐scale solute transport that accounts for the time‐varying, discharge‐dependent turnover of reach storage.