Open AccessGlobal modeling of the low‐ and middle‐latitude ionospheric D and lower E regions and implications for HF radio wave absorption
Author(s) -
Siskind David E.,
Zawdie K. A.,
Sassi F.,
Drob D.,
Friedrich M.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
space weather
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.254
H-Index - 56
ISSN - 1542-7390
DOI - 10.1002/2016sw001546
Subject(s) - middle latitudes , atmospheric sciences , ionosphere , latitude , altitude (triangle) , environmental science , thermosphere , absorption (acoustics) , electron density , atmosphere (unit) , climatology , physics , meteorology , electron , geology , geophysics , mathematics , astronomy , geometry , quantum mechanics , acoustics
Abstract We compare D and lower E region ionospheric model calculations driven by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) with a selection of electron density profiles made by sounding rockets over the past 50 years. The WACCM model, in turn, is nudged by winds and temperatures from the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System‐Advanced Level Physics High Altitude (NOGAPS‐ALPHA). This nudging has been shown to greatly improve the representation of key neutral constituents, such as nitric oxide (NO), that are used as inputs to the ionospheric model. We show that with this improved representation, we greatly improve the comparison between calculated and observed electron densities relative to older studies. At midlatitudes, for both winter and equinoctal conditions, the model agrees well with the data. At tropical latitudes, our results confirm a previous suggestion that there is a model deficit in the calculated electron density in the lowermost D region. We then apply the calculated electron densities to examine the variation of HF absorption with altitude, latitude, and season and from 2008 to 2009. For low latitudes, our results agree with recent studies showing a primary peak absorption in the lower E region with a secondary peak below 75 km. For midlatitude to high latitude, the absorption contains a significant contribution from the middle D region where ionization of NO drives the ion chemistry. The difference in middle‐ to high‐latitude absorption from 2008 to 2009 is due to changes in the NO abundance near 80 km from changes in the wintertime mesospheric residual circulation.