z-logo
Premium
MUF variability in the Arctic region: A statistical comparison with the ITU‐R variability factors
Author(s) -
Athieno R.,
Jayachandran P. T.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
radio science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.371
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1944-799X
pISSN - 0048-6604
DOI - 10.1002/2016rs006096
Subject(s) - equinox , the arctic , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , latitude , arctic , range (aeronautics) , ionosphere , mathematics , decile , climatology , meteorology , geography , statistics , physics , geology , geodesy , oceanography , materials science , composite material , astronomy
The maximum usable frequency (MUF(3000) F 2) decile factors obtained from observations at five stations located in the Arctic region: Resolute (74.75°N, 265.10°E), Dikson (73.50°N, 80.40°E), Norilsk (69.40°N, 88.10°E), Loparskaya (68.00°N, 33.00°E), and Sodankyla (67.40°N, 26.60°E) have been compared with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU‐R) estimates over three solar cycles (1961–2013). The summer MUF(3000) F 2 variability has been found to lie in the range of ±0.2, whereas limits for equinox and winter seasons are ±0.3 and ±0.5, respectively. This observation seems to directly translate into high differences between the measurement‐derived and ITU‐R decile values in winter and the smaller values for summer. These results illustrate that the high latitude ionosphere, and thus the MUF, is highly variable in winter, followed by the equinox, and experiences a low variability in summer.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here