Premium
Quantifying peat carbon accumulation in Alaska using a process‐based biogeochemistry model
Author(s) -
Wang Sirui,
Zhuang Qianlai,
Yu Zicheng,
Bridgham Scott,
Keller Jason K.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8961
pISSN - 2169-8953
DOI - 10.1002/2016jg003452
Subject(s) - peat , holocene , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , soil carbon , water table , carbon cycle , carbon fibers , ecosystem , vegetation (pathology) , climate change , atmospheric sciences , physical geography , climatology , soil science , geology , groundwater , ecology , soil water , oceanography , geography , medicine , materials science , geotechnical engineering , pathology , composite number , composite material , biology
Abstract This study uses an integrated modeling framework that couples the dynamics of hydrology, soil thermal regime, and ecosystem carbon and nitrogen to quantify the long‐term peat carbon accumulation in Alaska during the Holocene. Modeled hydrology, soil thermal regime, carbon pools and fluxes, and methane emissions are evaluated using observation data at several peatland sites in Minnesota, Alaska, and Canada. The model is then applied for a 10,000 year (15 ka to 5 ka; 1 ka = 1000 cal years before present) simulation at four peatland sites. We find that model simulations match the observed carbon accumulation rates at fen sites during the Holocene ( R 2 = 0.88, 0.87, 0.38, and −0.05 using comparisons in 500 year bins). The simulated (2.04 m) and observed peat depths (on average 1.98 m) were also compared well ( R 2 = 0.91). The early Holocene carbon accumulation rates, especially during the Holocene thermal maximum (HTM) (35.9 g C m − 2 yr − 1 ), are estimated up to 6 times higher than the rest of the Holocene (6.5 g C m − 2 yr − 1 ). Our analysis suggests that high summer temperature and the lengthened growing season resulted from the elevated insolation seasonality, along with wetter‐than‐before conditions might be major factors causing the rapid carbon accumulation in Alaska during the HTM. Our sensitivity tests indicate that, apart from climate, initial water table depth and vegetation canopy are major drivers to the estimated peat carbon accumulation. When the modeling framework is evaluated for various peatland types in the Arctic, it can quantify peatland carbon accumulation at regional scales.