z-logo
Premium
Monitoring rock freezing and thawing by novel geoelectrical and acoustic techniques
Author(s) -
Murton Julian B.,
Kuras Oliver,
Krautblatter Michael,
Cane Tim,
Tschofen Dominique,
Uhlemann Sebastian,
Schober Sandra,
Watson Phil
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: earth surface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9011
pISSN - 2169-9003
DOI - 10.1002/2016jf003948
Subject(s) - microseism , geology , rockfall , permafrost , fracture (geology) , electrical resistivity tomography , acoustic emission , geotechnical engineering , porosity , electrical resistivity and conductivity , cracking , mineralogy , seismology , materials science , composite material , landslide , oceanography , engineering , electrical engineering
Abstract Automated monitoring of freeze‐thaw cycles and fracture propagation in mountain rockwalls is needed to provide early warning about rockfall hazards. Conventional geoelectrical methods such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) are limited by large and variable ohmic contact resistances, requiring galvanic coupling with metal electrodes inserted into holes drilled into rock, and which can be loosened by rock weathering. We report a novel experimental methodology that combined capacitive resistivity imaging (CRI), ERT, and microseismic event recording to monitor freeze‐thaw of six blocks of hard and soft limestones under conditions simulating an active layer above permafrost and seasonally frozen rock in a nonpermafrost environment. Our results demonstrate that the CRI method is highly sensitive to freeze‐thaw processes; it yields property information equivalent to that obtained with conventional ERT and offers a viable route for nongalvanic long‐term geoelectrical monitoring, extending the benefits of the methodology to soft/hard rock environments. Contact impedances achieved with CRI are less affected by seasonal temperature changes, the aggregate state of the pore water (liquid or frozen), and the presence of low‐porosity rock with high matrix resistivities than those achieved with ERT. Microseismic monitoring has the advantage over acoustic emissions that events were recorded in relevant field distances of meters to decameters from cracking events. For the first time we recorded about 1000 microcracking events and clustered them in four groups according to frequency and waveform. Compared to previous studies, mainly on ice‐cracking in glaciers, the groups are attributed to single‐ or multiple‐stage cracking events such as crack coalescence.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here