z-logo
Premium
Turbulent kinetic energy of the ocean winds over the K uroshio E xtension from Q uik SCAT winds (1999–2009)
Author(s) -
Yu Kai,
Dong Changming,
King Gregory P.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9291
pISSN - 2169-9275
DOI - 10.1002/2016jc012404
Subject(s) - baroclinity , turbulence , physics , mesoscale meteorology , energy cascade , turbulence kinetic energy , kinetic energy , rossby number , climatology , meteorology , atmospheric sciences , geology , mechanics , classical mechanics
Abstract We investigate mesoscale turbulence (10–1000 km) in the ocean winds over the Kuroshio Extension (28 ° N–40 ° N,140 ° E–180 ° E) using the QuikSCAT data set (November 1999 to October 2009). We calculate the second ( D jj ) and third‐order structure functions ( D jjj ) and the spatial variance ( V j ) as a function of scale r ( j = L , T denotes, respectively, the longitudinal (divergent) and transverse (vortical) component). The most interesting results of the analysis follow. Although bothV j ( r ) andD j j( r ) measure the turbulent kinetic energy ( TKE ), we find thatV j ( r ) is the more robust measure. The spatial variance density ( dV j / dr ) has a broad peak near 450 km (close to the midlatitude Rossby radius of deformation). On interannual time scales, TKE correlates well with the El Niño 3.4 index. According to turbulence theory, the kinetic energy cascades downscale (upscale) ifD L L L( r ) (also skewnessS L = D L L L/ D L L 3 / 2) is negative (positive). Our results for the Kuroshio Extension are consistent with a downscale cascade (indicating convergence dominates). Furthermore, classical turbulence theory predicts thatS L = − 0.3 and independent of r ; however, we find S L varies strongly with r , from −4 at small scales to −0.3 at large scales. This nonclassical behavior implies strong‐scale interaction, which we attribute to the rapid, and sometimes explosive, growth of storms in the region through baroclinic instability. Finally, we find that S T (a measure of cyclonic/anticyclonic asymmetry) is positive (cyclonic) and also varies strongly with r , from 4 at small scales to 0.5 at large scales. New turbulence models are needed to explain these results, and that will benefit Weather Prediction and climate modeling.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here