Premium
Evaluation and reformulation of the maximum peak height algorithm ( M PH) and application in a hypertrophic lagoon
Author(s) -
Pitarch Jaime,
RuizVerdú Antonio,
Sendra María D.,
Santoleri Rosalia
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9291
pISSN - 2169-9275
DOI - 10.1002/2016jc012174
Subject(s) - environmental science , phytoplankton , algorithm , atmospheric correction , eutrophication , chlorophyll a , remote sensing , data set , flagging , mathematics , atmospheric sciences , statistics , biology , ecology , physics , cartography , geography , botany , optics , reflectivity , nutrient
We studied the performance of the MERIS maximum peak height (MPH) algorithm in the retrieval of chlorophyll‐a concentration (CHL), using a matchup data set of Bottom‐of‐Rayleigh Reflectances (BRR) and CHL from a hypertrophic lake (Albufera de Valencia). The MPH algorithm produced a slight underestimation of CHL in the pixels classified as cyanobacteria (83% of the total) and a strong overestimation in those classified as eukaryotic phytoplankton (17%). In situ biomass data showed that the binary classification of MPH was not appropriate for mixed phytoplankton populations, producing also unrealistic discontinuities in the CHL maps. We recalibrated MPH using our matchup data set and found that a single calibration curve of third degree fitted equally well to all matchups regardless of how they were classified. As a modification to the former approach, we incorporated the Phycocyanin Index (PCI) in the formula, thus taking into account the gradient of phytoplankton composition, which reduced the CHL retrieval errors. By using in situ biomass data, we also proved that PCI was indeed an indicator of cyanobacterial dominance. We applied our recalibration of the MPH algorithm to the whole MERIS data set (2002–2012). Results highlight the usefulness of the MPH algorithm as a tool to monitor eutrophication. The relevance of this fact is higher since MPH does not require a complete atmospheric correction, which often fails over such waters. An adequate flagging or correction of sun glint is advisable though, since the MPH algorithm was sensitive to sun glint.