Premium
Comparative study of three reconnection X line models at the Earth's dayside magnetopause using in situ observations
Author(s) -
Souza V. M.,
Gonzalez W. D.,
Sibeck D. G.,
Koga D.,
Walsh B. M.,
Mendes O.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2016ja023790
Subject(s) - magnetopause , magnetic reconnection , physics , line (geometry) , geophysics , field line , magnetosheath , astrophysics , outflow , magnetosphere , plasma , geometry , meteorology , mathematics , quantum mechanics
This work examines the large‐scale aspects of magnetic field reconnection at the Earth's dayside magnetopause. We use two sets of reconnection events, which are identified mostly by the in situ detection of accelerated and Alfvénic plasma flows. We intercompare three analytical models that predict the reconnection X line location and orientation, namely, the Trattner et al. (2007) and Swisdak and Drake (2007) models and also a modified version of the component merging model. In the first set of reconnection observations, we show three fortuitous, quasi‐simultaneous dayside magnetopause crossing events where two widely separated spacecraft detect reconnection signatures, and the X line location and orientation can be inferred from the observations. We compare X line model predictions to those inferred from observations. These three reconnection events indicate the presence of an extended (>7 Earth radii in length), component‐type reconnection X line on Earth's dayside magnetopause connecting and structuring the reconnection signatures at locations far apart. In the second set of reconnection events, we analyze the X line models' performance in predicting the observed reconnection outflow direction, i.e., its north‐south and/or east‐west senses, in a total of 75 single, rather than multiple and quasi‐simultaneous, magnetopause crossing events, where reconnection‐associated plasma flows were clearly present. We found that the Swisdak and Drake's (2007) X line model performs slightly better, albeit not statistically significant, when predicting both accelerated plasma flow north‐south and east‐west components in 73% and 53% of the cases, respectively, as compared to the Trattner et al. (2007) model (70% north‐south and 42% east‐west) and the modified component merging model (66% north‐south and 50% east‐west).