z-logo
Premium
Moment rate scaling for earthquakes 3.3 ≤  M  ≤ 5.3 with implications for stress drop
Author(s) -
Archuleta Ralph J.,
Ji Chen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1002/2016gl071433
Subject(s) - scaling , physics , amplitude , attenuation , drop (telecommunication) , seismic moment , ground motion , moment (physics) , magnitude (astronomy) , geodesy , geometry , seismology , mathematics , optics , geology , classical mechanics , astrophysics , telecommunications , fault (geology) , computer science
We have determined a scalable apparent moment rate function (aMRF) that correctly predicts the peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), local magnitude, and the ratio of PGA/PGV for earthquakes 3.3 ≤  M  ≤ 5.3. Using the NGA‐West2 database for 3.0 ≤  M  ≤ 7.7, we find a break in scaling of LogPGA and LogPGV versus M around M  ~ 5.3 with nearly linear scaling for LogPGA and LogPGV for 3.3 ≤  M  ≤ 5.3. Temporal parameters t p and t d —related to rise time and total duration—control the aMRF. Both scale with seismic moment. The Fourier amplitude spectrum of the aMRF has two corners between which the spectrum decays ~  f − 1 . Significant attenuation along the raypath results in a Brune‐like spectrum with one corner f C . Assuming that f C  ≅ 1/ t d , the aMRF predicts non‐self‐similar scaling M 0 ∝ f C 3.3 and weak stress drop scaling Δ σ ∝ M 0 0.091 . This aMRF can explain why stress drop is different from the stress parameter used to predict high‐frequency ground motion.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here