Premium
Assimilation of gridded terrestrial water storage observations from GRACE into a land surface model
Author(s) -
Girotto Manuela,
De Lannoy Gabriëlle J. M.,
Reichle Rolf H.,
Rodell Matthew
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1002/2015wr018417
Subject(s) - data assimilation , environmental science , water content , assimilation (phonology) , climatology , numerical weather prediction , water storage , satellite , meteorology , moisture , geology , geography , linguistics , philosophy , geotechnical engineering , geomorphology , aerospace engineering , engineering , inlet
Observations of terrestrial water storage (TWS) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission have a coarse resolution in time (monthly) and space (roughly 150,000 km 2 at midlatitudes) and vertically integrate all water storage components over land, including soil moisture and groundwater. Data assimilation can be used to horizontally downscale and vertically partition GRACE‐TWS observations. This work proposes a variant of existing ensemble‐based GRACE‐TWS data assimilation schemes. The new algorithm differs in how the analysis increments are computed and applied. Existing schemes correlate the uncertainty in the modeled monthly TWS estimates with errors in the soil moisture profile state variables at a single instant in the month and then apply the increment either at the end of the month or gradually throughout the month. The proposed new scheme first computes increments for each day of the month and then applies the average of those increments at the beginning of the month. The new scheme therefore better reflects submonthly variations in TWS errors. The new and existing schemes are investigated here using gridded GRACE‐TWS observations. The assimilation results are validated at the monthly time scale, using in situ measurements of groundwater depth and soil moisture across the U.S. The new assimilation scheme yields improved (although not in a statistically significant sense) skill metrics for groundwater compared to the open‐loop (no assimilation) simulations and compared to the existing assimilation schemes. A smaller impact is seen for surface and root‐zone soil moisture, which have a shorter memory and receive smaller increments from TWS assimilation than groundwater. These results motivate future efforts to combine GRACE‐TWS observations with observations that are more sensitive to surface soil moisture, such as L‐band brightness temperature observations from Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) or Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP). Finally, we demonstrate that the scaling parameters that are applied to the GRACE observations prior to assimilation should be consistent with the land surface model that is used within the assimilation system.