z-logo
Premium
The relative importance of head, flux, and prior information in hydraulic tomography analysis
Author(s) -
Michael Tso ChakHau,
Zha Yuanyuan,
Jim Yeh TianChyi,
Wen JetChau
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1002/2015wr017191
Subject(s) - flux (metallurgy) , head (geology) , tomography , resolution (logic) , prior information , statistics , geology , mathematics , computer science , physics , artificial intelligence , materials science , optics , geomorphology , metallurgy
Using cross‐correlation analysis, we demonstrate that flux measurements at observation locations during hydraulic tomography (HT) surveys carry nonredundant information about heterogeneity that are complementary to head measurements at the same locations. We then hypothesize that a joint interpretation of head and flux data, even when the same observation network as head has been used, can enhance the resolution of HT estimates. Subsequently, we use numerical experiments to test this hypothesis and investigate the impact of flux conditioning and prior information (such as correlation lengths and initial mean models (i.e., uniform mean or distributed means)) on the HT estimates of a nonstationary, layered medium. We find that the addition of flux conditioning to HT analysis improves the estimates in all of the prior models tested. While prior information on geologic structures could be useful, its influence on the estimates reduces as more nonredundant data (i.e., flux) are used in the HT analysis. Lastly, recommendations for conducting HT surveys and analysis are presented.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here