z-logo
Premium
Dual nitrate isotopes clarify the role of biological processing and hydrologic flow paths on nitrogen cycling in subtropical low‐gradient watersheds
Author(s) -
Griffiths Natalie A.,
Jackson C. Rhett,
McDonnell Jeffrey J.,
Klaus Julian,
Du Enhao,
Bitew Menberu M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8961
pISSN - 2169-8953
DOI - 10.1002/2015jg003189
Subject(s) - watershed , environmental science , cycling , snowmelt , hydrology (agriculture) , nitrate , subsurface flow , denitrification , nitrification , nitrogen cycle , groundwater , surface runoff , nitrogen , ecology , geology , chemistry , geography , geotechnical engineering , archaeology , organic chemistry , machine learning , computer science , biology
Nitrogen (N) is an important nutrient as it often limits productivity but in excess can impair water quality. Most studies on watershed N cycling have occurred in upland forested catchments where snowmelt dominates N export; fewer studies have focused on low‐relief watersheds that lack snow. We examined watershed N cycling in three adjacent, low‐relief watersheds in the Upper Coastal Plain of the southeastern United States to better understand the role of hydrological flow paths and biological transformations of N at the watershed scale. Groundwater was the dominant source of nitrified N to stream water in two of the three watersheds, while atmospheric deposition comprised 28% of stream water nitrate in one watershed. The greater atmospheric contribution may have been due to the larger stream channel area relative to total watershed area or the dominance of shallow subsurface flow paths contributing to stream flow in this watershed. There was a positive relationship between temperature and stream water ammonium concentrations and a negative relationship between temperature and stream water nitrate concentrations in each watershed suggesting that N cycling processes (i.e., nitrification and denitrification) varied seasonally. However, there were no clear patterns in the importance of denitrification in different water pools possibly because a variety of factors (i.e., assimilatory uptake, dissimilatory uptake, and mixing) affected nitrate concentrations. Together, these results highlight the hydrological and biological controls on N cycling in low‐gradient watersheds and variability in N delivery flow paths among adjacent watersheds with similar physical characteristics.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here