z-logo
Premium
The interaction between gravity waves and solar tides: Results from 4‐D ray tracing coupled to a linear tidal model
Author(s) -
Ribstein B.,
Achatz U.,
Senf F.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2015ja021349
Subject(s) - physics , wkb approximation , tidal waves , tidal model , mechanics , classical mechanics , computational physics , geophysics , geology , oceanography , quantum mechanics
The interaction between solar tides (STs) and gravity waves (GWs) is studied via the coupling of a three‐dimensional ray tracer model and a linear tidal model. The ray tracer model describes GW dynamics on a spatially and time‐dependent background formed by a monthly mean climatology and STs. It does not suffer from typical simplifications of conventional GW parameterizations where horizontal GW propagation and the effects of horizontal background gradients on GW dynamics are neglected. The ray tracer model uses a variant of Wentzel‐Kramers‐Brillouin (WKB) theory where a spectral description in position wave number space is helping to avoid numerical instabilities otherwise likely to occur in caustic‐like situations. The tidal model has been obtained by linearization of the primitive equations about a monthly mean, allowing for stationary planetary waves. The communication between ray tracer model and tidal model is facilitated using latitude‐ and altitude‐dependent coefficients, named Rayleigh friction and Newtonian relaxation, and obtained from regressing GW momentum and buoyancy fluxes against the STs and their tendencies. These coefficients are calculated by the ray tracer model and then implemented into the tidal model. An iterative procedure updates successively the GW fields and the tidal fields until convergence is reached. Notwithstanding the simplicity of the employed GW source, many aspects of observed tidal dynamics are reproduced. It is shown that the conventional “single‐column” approximation leads to significantly overestimated GW fluxes and hence underestimated ST amplitudes, pointing at a sensitive issue of GW parameterizations in general.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here