z-logo
Premium
Is the subarctic landscape still a carbon sink? Evidence from a detailed catchment balance
Author(s) -
Lundin Erik J.,
Klaminder Jonatan,
Giesler Reiner,
Persson Andreas,
Olefeldt David,
Heliasz Michal,
Christensen Torben R.,
Karlsson Jan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1002/2015gl066970
Subject(s) - subarctic climate , sink (geography) , environmental science , drainage basin , peat , carbon sink , watershed , water balance , soil water , catchment hydrology , hydrology (agriculture) , climate change , ecology , geography , geology , soil science , biology , cartography , geotechnical engineering , machine learning , computer science
Climate warming raises the question whether high‐latitude landscape still function as net carbon (C) sinks. By compiling an integrated C balance for an intensely studied subarctic catchment, we show that this catchment's C balance is not likely to be a strong current sink of C, a commonly held assumption. In fact, it is more plausible (71% probability) that the studied catchment functions as a C source (−11 ± 20 g C m −2  yr −1 ). Analyses of individual fluxes indicate that soil and aquatic C losses offset C sequestering in other landscape components (e.g., peatlands and aboveground forest biomass). Our results stress the importance of fully integrated catchment C balance estimates and highlight the importance of upland soils and their interaction with the aquatic network for the catchment C balance.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom