Premium
Model forecast skill and sensitivity to initial conditions in the seasonal Sea Ice Outlook
Author(s) -
BlanchardWrigglesworth E.,
Cullather R. I.,
Wang W.,
Zhang J.,
Bitz C. M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1002/2015gl065860
Subject(s) - forecast skill , sea ice , climatology , the arctic , perturbation (astronomy) , lead (geology) , arctic , meteorology , environmental science , sensitivity (control systems) , geology , physics , oceanography , engineering , quantum mechanics , geomorphology , electronic engineering
We explore the skill of predictions of September Arctic sea ice extent from dynamical models participating in the Sea Ice Outlook (SIO). Forecasts submitted in August, at roughly 2 month lead times, are skillful. However, skill is lower in forecasts submitted to SIO, which began in 2008, than in hindcasts (retrospective forecasts) of the last few decades. The multimodel mean SIO predictions offer slightly higher skill than the single‐model SIO predictions, but neither beats a damped persistence forecast at longer than 2 month lead times. The models are largely unsuccessful at predicting each other, indicating a large difference in model physics and/or initial conditions. Motivated by this, we perform an initial condition sensitivity experiment with four SIO models, applying a fixed −1 m perturbation to the initial sea ice thickness. The significant range of the response among the models suggests that different model physics make a significant contribution to forecast uncertainty.