Premium
Estimation of direct, diffuse, and total FPARs from Landsat surface reflectance data and ground‐based estimates over six FLUXNET sites
Author(s) -
Li Wenjuan,
Fang Hongliang
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8961
pISSN - 2169-8953
DOI - 10.1002/2014jg002754
Subject(s) - fluxnet , photosynthetically active radiation , thematic mapper , environmental science , leaf area index , remote sensing , vegetation (pathology) , canopy , atmospheric radiative transfer codes , atmospheric sciences , radiative transfer , satellite imagery , chemistry , geology , geography , ecosystem , physics , eddy covariance , ecology , optics , archaeology , medicine , biochemistry , photosynthesis , biology , pathology
Abstract The fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by green elements (FPAR) is an essential climate variable in quantifying canopy absorbed PAR (APAR) and gross and net primary production. Current satellite FPAR products typically correspond to black‐sky FPAR under direct illumination only, but the radiation transfer and vegetation absorption processes differ for direct and diffuse PARs. To address this, the present study developed a new approach to estimate direct, diffuse, and total FPARs, separately, from Landsat surface reflectance data. Field‐measured direct and diffuse FPARs were first derived for crops, deciduous broadleaf forests, and evergreen needleleaf forests at six FLUXNET sites. Then, a coupled soil‐leaf‐canopy radiative transfer model (SLC) was used to simulate surface reflectance under direct and diffuse illumination conditions. Direct, diffuse, and total FPARs were estimated by comparing Landsat‐5 Thematic Mapper (TM) data and simulated surface reflectances using a lookup table approach. The differences between the Landsat‐estimated and the field‐measured FPARs are less than 0.05 (10%). The diffuse FPAR is higher than the direct FPAR by up to 19.38%, whereas the total FPAR is larger than the direct FPAR by up to 16.07%. The direct APAR is higher than the diffuse APAR under clear‐sky conditions, but underestimates the total APAR by −277.72 µmol s −1 m −2 on average. The approach described here can be extended to estimate direct, diffuse, and total FPARs from other satellite data and the obtained FPAR variables could be helpful to improve modeling of vegetation processes.