Premium
Advanced stratospheric data processing of radio occultation with a variational combination for multifrequency GNSS signals
Author(s) -
Wee TaeKwon,
Kuo YingHwa
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/2014jd022204
Subject(s) - radiosonde , radio occultation , stratosphere , a priori and a posteriori , remote sensing , meteorology , environmental science , occultation , noise (video) , gnss applications , data processing , computer science , algorithm , global positioning system , database , geology , physics , telecommunications , artificial intelligence , philosophy , epistemology , astronomy , image (mathematics)
As the understanding of our Earth system grows, the importance of comprehending the structure and processes in the remote stratosphere is intensified and the interest in stratospheric observations mushrooms. Despite its great potential, radio occultation (RO) data have been underused in exploiting the stratosphere. A major reason for the underutilization is the imperfections in preexisting RO data processing methods. We propose an advanced stratospheric RO data processing, where the variational method provides a general framework in which multiple‐frequency RO measurements of different quality are effectively combined with the aid of a priori. The variational combination (VAR) is designed to extract the most information from RO measurements, where a priori plays a role of enhancing the observation and attenuating measurement noise. The signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) is found to be a universal quality indicator, which concisely describes the uncertainty of RO measurements in diverse conditions. The measured SNR is used to parameterize a dynamic observation error, which is essential for the VAR to use the observation optimally. Tests with real data show that VAR significantly improves the accuracy of the RO retrieval even in the upper stratosphere, where the RO data were once considered to possess little observational value. When compared with independent radiosonde observations, for instance, the VAR‐produced data are more accurate than the analysis from the European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts for which the radiosonde data have been assimilated. The VAR‐produced data are also precise enough to reveal the systematic error of the radiosonde data.