Premium
An integrated paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and geochemical study of the Marcellus shale in the Valley and Ridge province in Pennsylvania and West Virginia
Author(s) -
Manning Earl Berry,
Elmore R. D.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1002/2014jb011418
Subject(s) - pyrrhotite , geology , geochemistry , magnetite , permian , paleomagnetism , diagenesis , natural remanent magnetization , anticline , pyrite , breccia , remanence , mineralogy , paleontology , magnetization , tectonics , physics , structural basin , quantum mechanics , magnetic field
An integrated paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and diagenetic study of the Devonian Marcellus Subgroup from threefolds in the Valley and Ridge province in Pennsylvania and West Virginia indicates that the unit contains an intermediate temperature chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) with south‐southeast declinations and shallow negative inclinations residing in pyrrhotite and a CRM with more southerly declinations and shallow positive inclinations residing in magnetite. Rock magnetic results confirm the presence of pyrrhotite and magnetite. Tilt tests indicate that pyrrhotite and magnetite CRMs are syntilting to posttilting, and paleopoles for both CRMs are similar and plot on the Permian part of the apparent polar wander path for North America. The Marcellus Subgroup has a complex paragenetic sequence which includes bitumen deposition and vein formation. The magnetite and pyrrhotite CRMs formed in the Permian, probably due to burial diagenetic processes and not orogenic fluids. The base of the unit contains the highest total organic content (TOC) values and highest magnetic intensities, both of which decrease up section. This connection between TOC and magnetic intensity suggests that the magnetite formed as a result of the maturation of the organic matter although more work is needed to test this hypothesis. The pyrrhotite may have formed as a result of thermochemical sulfate reduction involving organic matter during the production of methane in this gas reservoir. The similar Permian CRM ages may be explained by thrusting which resulted in rapid burial of the Marcellus Subgroup as it passed through the oil window and into the gas window quickly producing magnetite and pyrrhotite, respectively.