Premium
Laboratory constraints on models of earthquake recurrence
Author(s) -
Beeler N. M.,
Tullis Terry,
Junger Jenni,
Kilgore Brian,
Goldsby David
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1002/2014jb011184
Subject(s) - slip (aerodynamics) , predictability , drop (telecommunication) , mechanics , logarithm , nonlinear system , materials science , geology , physics , mathematics , statistics , computer science , thermodynamics , mathematical analysis , telecommunications , quantum mechanics
In this study, rock friction “stick‐slip” experiments are used to develop constraints on models of earthquake recurrence. Constant rate loading of bare rock surfaces in high‐quality experiments produces stick‐slip recurrence that is periodic at least to second order. When the loading rate is varied, recurrence is approximately inversely proportional to loading rate. These laboratory events initiate due to a slip‐rate‐dependent process that also determines the size of the stress drop and, as a consequence, stress drop varies weakly but systematically with loading rate. This is especially evident in experiments where the loading rate is changed by orders of magnitude, as is thought to be the loading condition of naturally occurring, small repeating earthquakes driven by afterslip, or low‐frequency earthquakes loaded by episodic slip. The experimentally observed stress drops are well described by a logarithmic dependence on recurrence interval that can be cast as a nonlinear slip predictable model. The fault's rate dependence of strength is the key physical parameter. Additionally, even at constant loading rate the most reproducible laboratory recurrence is not exactly periodic, unlike existing friction recurrence models. We present example laboratory catalogs that document the variance and show that in large catalogs, even at constant loading rate, stress drop and recurrence covary systematically. The origin of this covariance is largely consistent with variability of the dependence of fault strength on slip rate. Laboratory catalogs show aspects of both slip and time predictability, and successive stress drops are strongly correlated indicating a “memory” of prior slip history that extends over at least one recurrence cycle.