z-logo
Premium
Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874
Author(s) -
Lockwood M.,
Owens M. J.,
Barnard L.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2014ja019970
Subject(s) - sunspot , sunspot number , earth's magnetic field , meteorology , greenwich , physics , mathematics , statistics , astrophysics , environmental science , solar cycle , magnetic field , solar wind , quantum mechanics , soil science
We analyze the widely used international/Zürich sunspot number record, R , with a view to quantifying a suspected calibration discontinuity around 1945 (which has been termed the “Waldmeier discontinuity”). We compare R against the composite sunspot group data from the Royal Greenwich Observatory network and the Solar Optical Observing Network, using both the number of sunspot groups, N G , and the total area of the sunspots, A G . In addition, we compare R with the recently developed interdiurnal variability geomagnetic indices IDV and IDV (1d). In all four cases, linearity of the relationship with R is not assumed and care is taken to ensure that the relationship of each with R is the same before and after the putative calibration change. It is shown the probability that a correction is not needed is of order 10 −8 and that R is indeed too low before 1945. The optimum correction to R for values before 1945 is found to be 11.6%, 11.7%, 10.3%, and 7.9% using A G , N G , IDV , and IDV (1d), respectively. The optimum value obtained by combining the sunspot group data is 11.6% with an uncertainty range 8.1–14.8% at the 2 σ level. The geomagnetic indices provide an independent yet less stringent test but do give values that fall within the 2 σ uncertainty band with optimum values are slightly lower than from the sunspot group data. The probability of the correction needed being as large as 20%, as advocated by Svalgaard (2011), is shown to be 1.6 × 10 −5 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom