Premium
Noise statistics identification for Kalman filtering of the electron radiation belt observations I: Model errors
Author(s) -
Podladchikova T. V.,
Shprits Y. Y.,
Kondrashov D.,
Kellerman A. C.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/2014ja019897
Subject(s) - kalman filter , smoothing , covariance , data assimilation , algorithm , errors in variables models , covariance matrix , statistics , computer science , noise (video) , identification (biology) , van allen radiation belt , observational error , satellite , mathematics , meteorology , physics , artificial intelligence , botany , image (mathematics) , biology , magnetosphere , plasma , quantum mechanics , astronomy
In this study we present a first attempt to identify errors of the 1‐D radial diffusion model for relativistic electron phase space density (PSD). In practice, the model error and characteristics of satellite observations are poorly known, which may cause failure of a Kalman filter algorithm. Correct specification of model errors statistics is necessary for the development of the next generation of radiation belt specification models providing the effective PSD reconstruction and hence the prediction and mitigation of space weather effects in the hazardous space environment. The proposed approach to the identification of errors statistics is based on estimating the unknown bias and the covariance matrix of model errors from the sparse CRRES observations over a period of 441 days, from 28 July 1990 to 11 October 1991. With our technique we demonstrate that model errors are biased. Neglecting the bias when applying a data assimilation algorithm to radiation belt electrons can cause significant errors of the PSD estimate during data gaps. Both the identified bias and the covariance matrix of model errors increase with increase of L shell. Sensitivity of the PSD reconstruction to model errors statistics and advances of the improved physical‐based model based on the model errors identification are illustrated by a number of representative examples of the PSD reanalysis. Identification of satellite observations characteristics, and filtration and smoothing algorithms are discussed in the companion paper.